Site look funky? Your browser is so old standards-based layouts and styling confuse it. Consider updating. One excellent option is Mozilla Firefox, versions of which are available for Linux, Mac and Windows.
FOIA Explores Chattooga Headwaters Closure
posted February 28, 2002
by Jason Robertson
American Whitewater is seeking to learn more about why the headwaters of the Chattooga river were closed to boating in the mid-1970's. Our volunteers and representatives have made dozens of attempts to find a definitive answer to this question. In early 2002, we felt that we had exhausted all publicly available opportunities to learn this information and had no alternative but to ask the Forest Service to make the information readily available through the attached Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
On behalf of the non-profit American Whitewater, I hereby
request the following information under the Freedom of Information Act, 5
U.S.C.§552:
Copies
of any documents or records (including memoranda, correspondence, studies
and planning documents) prepared or obtained by the United States Forest
Service (USFS) or United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) between
1969 and the present, which contain any reference to “whitewater
recreation”, “floating”, “boating,” “canoeing”, and/or “kayaking” on the
Chattooga River upstream of Highway 28.
Note
that this river segment upstream of Highway 28 is often referred to as
“Section 1” or uncommonly as “Section 0” in USFS documents and that the floating public often
refers to this river section as “Section 0”, “Section 00”, or “Section
1”.
Note
that this river segment is located in part in Nantahala National Forest
in North Carolina, passes through the Ellicott Rock Wilderness, and
separates the Chattahoochee National Forest in Georgia and Sumter
National Forest in South Carolina. The SumterNational Forest is the lead agency on managing the Wild and
Scenic sections of the Chattooga.
Note
that regulation 36 CFR 261.77.c may reference this subject, and that we
are also interested in this regulation per requested item #3 below.
Note
that “Appendix M” of the Sumter National Forest’s Chattooga River Wild
and Scenic River Management Plan references floating on this section of
river, and that we are also interested in Appendix M per requested item
#3 below.
Note
that floating use was addressed in the 1971 Chattooga Wild and Scenic River study document submitted to
Congress. The study was done to support designation of the Chattooga as a
Wild and Scenic River.
Note
that on May 10, 1974 Congress identified 57 miles of the Chattooga River
for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic River System.
Note that numerous individuals and
public interest non-profits, including American Whitewater, have
expressed written interest since the mid-1970’s in the policy question of
why this river section was closed to float use and how the Forest Service
has developed policy addressing public requests to reopen boating and
recreation upstream of Highway 28.
Note that former Forest
Supervisor Donald W. Eng prohibited floating North (upstream) of SC/GA
Highway 28 in 1981 for public safety purposes at the same time he
required the use of safety equipment such as helmets and life jackets on
the lower sections of the river [Appendix M, pg 32, 1985 Land and
Resources Management Plan (LRMP) for this letter and a comment of the
effect of this decision on safety on Appendix M, page 20, part III,
subsection H].Note that the ban
was reaffirmed in the 1985 LRMP. As in 1981, the LRMP limited floating to
Sections I, II, III, & IV in the Sumter and Chattahoochee National
Forests. However, no mention of safety was made in regard to the boating
ban; instead, the ban was described as a tool for providing "quality
trout fishing." under Appendix M, page 16, part III, subsection C of
the 1985 LRMP.
Note
that many boaters floated the sections upstream of Highway 28 prior to
passage of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act in 1974, and that the decision
to ban floating upstream of Highway 28 was apparently made after 1974 and
prior to the 1981 decision that was documented in the 1985 LRMP.We are seeking documentation dating
prior to 1985 of this initial policy decision limiting use upstream of
Highway 28.
Copies
of any documents or records (including memoranda, correspondence, studies
and planning documents) prepared or obtained by the United States Forest
Service (USFS) or United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) since
1990, which contain any reference to USFS Policy on limiting
non-commercial recreational boating, floating, or other whitewater
recreation on Wild & Scenic Rivers, and the Chattooga River in
particular, under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (P.L. 90-542.1.b).
Note
that there may have been relevant policy discussions re limiting such use
on the Wild & Scenic North Fork of the Kern River in California’s
Sequoia National Forest.
Copies
of any documents or records (including memoranda, correspondence, studies
and planning documents) prepared or obtained by the United States Forest
Service (USFS) or United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) between
1974 and the present, which contain (1) any reference to USFS policy or
actions under 36 CFR 261.77.c, and/or also (2) any reference to
USFS Policy regarding development or amendment of Appendix M of the Chattooga
River Management Plan re recreational boating use upstream of Highway 28.
Note
that Appendix M states “Floating north of Highway 28 Bridge is prohibited
through a condition of the floater permit under 36 CFR 261.77.c.”; and
that
36
CFR 261.77.c provides the apparent legal foundation for the prohibition
on boating in the headwaters by simply detailing that visitors must sign
a self registration floater permit before boating, and that the permit
will be made available at specified locations including the Highway 28
Bridge; but that
The
decision to limit all float use above Highway 28, does not appear to have
been detailed or explained in the public record and that the intent of
our request is to reveal how this policy decision was made, who made it,
and whether it was consistent with NEPA, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act,
and other relevant legislation, or whether the decision was simply made
through an error of omission and could be rectified through the issuance
of self-registration floater permits consistent with 36 CFR 261.77.c.
Copies
of any documents or records (including memoranda, correspondence, studies
and planning documents) prepared or obtained by the United States Forest
Service (USFS) or United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) between 1969
and the present, which contain any reference to USFS Policy regarding
Section 13.a of the Wild & Scenic Rivers Act, which states in part
“Nothing in this Act shall affect existing rights of any State, including
the right of access, with respect to the beds of navigable streams,
tributaries, or rivers (or segments thereof) located in a national wild,
scenic or recreational river area”; and also any which contain reference
to Section 13.a in relation to the State of Georgia, South Carolina,
and/or North Carolina on the navigability of the Chattooga River.
The
intent of this request is to reveal any documentation that the Forest
Service has available on the legal navigable status of the Chattooga
River and how Section 13.a applies specifically to the Chattooga River;
and
To
reveal any documentation on management policy re navigation management or
ownership claims or conflicts between the Forest Service and the States
bordering the Wild & Scenic Chattooga River; and
To
reveal any documentation on management policy re Forest Service
limitations and/or controls of recreational navigation on the Chattooga
River upstream of Highway 28, and Section III and IV.
I request that these records be provided within the ten
working days required by law. I also request, in accordance with the
requirements of FOIA, that any records or segments of records that are deemed
to be exempt from the Act be specifically described and correlated with a
particular FOIA exemption. If any requested documents cannot be sent because
they are not in final form, I request any completed parts and that my order be
split to avoid unnecessary delay.
I also request that you waive any applicable fees.
The Department of Agriculture has published FOIA guidelines for agencies to
follow in making fee waiver determinations.The guidelines, found at 7 CFR, Subtitle A, Part 1, Subpart A, Appendix
A, Section 6(a)(1), list six factors to be taken into consideration when
assessing fee waiver requests. This FOIA request clearly meets all six
factors:
(1)The request concerns the operations or activities of the
government in managing recreational boating on the Wild and Scenic Chattooga
River, as well as other federally-designated Wild and Scenic rivers.
(2)Management of recreational boating on the Chattooga River
appears inconsistent with management practices on other federally-designated
wild and Scenic Rivers; therefore clarification of the development of
management policies on the Chattooga is in the direct public interest.The disclosure of the requested information
will contribute directly to an understanding of the subject by the general
public with an interest in Forest Service management on the Wild and Scenic
Chattooga Rivers as well as individuals interested in the precedential value of
the management practices on the Chattooga relevant to other
Federally-designated Wild & Scenic Rivers.
(3)American Whitewater will disseminate a complete analysis of
the information to the general public via our website at www.AmericanWhitewater.org
(15,000 visitors daily, web search term “Chattooga”) and our bimonthly
publication the American Whitewater Journal (circ. 15,000).Both venues cover conservation and access
developments affecting whitewater recreationists, and American Whitewater’s
publications are an important source of information to this community.
(4)The disclosure of the requested information will contribute
directly and significantly to public understanding of how the Forest Service is
managing recreational boating on the Wild and Scenic Chattooga River.The issue is of particular interest to the
public as evidenced by the hundreds of comments received by the agency in a
recent NEPA scoping period on government management of recreational boating on
the Wild and Scenic Chattooga River.
(5)American Whitewater is a non-profit 501.c.3, public interest
organization and has no financial or commercial interest in the requested
records.
(6)American Whitewater represents 8,000 whitewater boaters
directly, and 160 affiliate canoe and kayak clubs with memberships exceeding
80,000 boaters. American Whitewater's sole interest in the requested records is
to advance the public's understanding of the government's policies and
practices in managing recreation on Wild and Scenic Rivers.
Accordingly, it is clear that a fee waiver is appropriate in
this case, since "disclosure of the information is in the public interest,
because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the
operations or activities of the government and is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester." 5 U. S. C. §
552(a)(4)(A)(iii).In addition, we do
not make this request to waive fees lightly; we have only chosen to ask the taxpayers
to fund the collection and sharing of this information after numerous failed
attempts on our part, the part of our volunteers, and the part of other
non-profits to obtain this information through non-FOIA public avenues and at
American Whitewater’s direct expense.
If you have any questions regarding this FOIA request please
call me at 301-589-9453 between 10am and 4pm on weekdays.
You may also send correspondence to: Jason@awa.org, or American Whitewater, 1430
Fenwick Lane, Silver Spring, MD 90210.