The Department of Justice attorneys submitted that the lawsuit filed by American Whitewater and another lawsuit filed in New Mexico, Randall vs. Norton et al, were similar and therefore should be heard in the same court. Judge Zilly said this was an insufficient reason to change venue. In his denial, Judge Zilly noted that the lawsuit "involves a different set of plaintiffs, different remedies sought, and to some extent, different legal issues."
The lawsuit filed in July of 2000 by the GCPBA, American Whitewater, American Canoe Association and National Parks Conservation Association, seeks to require Grand Canyon National Park to reopen the Colorado River Management Planning (CRMP) process. Citing lack of funding, lack of staff and contention between the various user constituencies, former superintendent Robert Arnberger shutdown the CRMP in February 2000.
In his ruling, Judge Zilly noted, "... The interests of justice do not require that all persons with similar complaints against the federal government litigate in the same district. In this case, where the complaint is directed at the operation of a park in Arizona, all the plaintiffs reside in, or have operations in, Arizona, and even the federal defendants are located in Arizona, a transfer of venue would be inappropriate." He went on to say "Whatever the outcome of Randall the issues in this case must be litigated. While inconsistencies may result, such inconsistencies are better resolved through the appellate process than by delaying these proceedings."
The case pending in New Mexico, Randall vs. Norton et al, seeks to order Grand Canyon National
Park to immediately resolve differences between user access opportunities to river trips on the
Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park. Currently a non-concessions river permit
authorizing travel on the river can take as long as 21 years to obtain, whereas a concessions
trip participant may gain access within a time frame ranging from several weeks to a maximum of
two years. Use between the two groups is divided as follows: general public 3,000 people per
year, concessions passengers and support staff 23,000 people per year. The backlog for
non-concessions permits has grown from about 2000 since the issue was last comprehensively
examined by the NPS in 1980 to more than 7000 today.
Flagstaff, AZ January 19, 2001 - The US District Court transferred American Whitewater's Grand Canyon Wilderness suit from Judge Rosenblatt to Judge Thomas Zilly of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. Judge Zilly, a Reagan appointee, will handle the case in the District of Arizona. He is best known for handling the Northern Spotted Owl case in the late 80s/early 90s. Research indicates that Judge Zilly is fair-minded and willing to enforce environmental and public land laws. Note that the transfer of the case from one Arizona federal judge to another is not a decision on the government's motion to transfer the case to the District of New Mexico.
Flagstaff, AZ July 6, 2000 - The Grand Canyon Private Boaters Association, American
Whitewater, and National Parks Conservation Association, along with individual plaintiffs
including Elizabeth Boussard and Kim Crumbo, filed suit today in federal court against Secretary
of Interior Bruce Babbitt, National Park Service Director Robert Stanton and Grand Canyon
National Park Superintendent Rob Arnberger.
The suit challenges Superintendent Arnberger's February 23 decision to halt work on a wilderness
plan and revised Colorado River management plan. The suit also alleges that the Park Service has
failed to protect the wilderness qualities of the Colorado River and failed to provide fair
access for all Americans who want to visit the Park via the river.
"We were very disappointed when Superintendent Arnberger ended public participation in the first
serious river plan revision in almost 20 years," said Willie Odem, President of Grand Canyon
Private Boaters Association (GCPBA).
"This suit is basically about democracy," said Randall Rasmussen, Policy Analyst for National
Parks Conservation Association (NPCA). "The NPS has short-circuited a process and our objective
is simply to get it back on track so that all parties can continue to participate equally."
"The decision to rob the public of its voice in the Grand Canyon is alarming," said Jason
Robertson, Access Director for American Whitewater. "The NPS cannot avoid its responsibilities
and simply bury its head in the sand whenever a controversial issue arises. The Superintendent's
decision to halt the planning process was incredibly short-sighted, and - unchallenged - will
have negative repercussions on other rivers throughout America."
The lawsuit, filed in the federal district court in Phoenix, seeks a resumption of the wilderness
and Colorado River planning process at Grand Canyon National Park. Plaintiffs allege that the
park's termination of those planning processes and previous management actions have violated the
National Park Service Organic Act, Wilderness Act, National Park System Concessions Policy Act,
National Environmental Policy Act, Administrative Procedures Act, and National Park Service
Management Policies and Plans. Plaintiffs outlined a list of issues the wilderness and river
planning process was designed to address, such as motorized uses and river access
management.
"The National Park Service has failed to take any action whatsoever to adjust or modify
allocation between the American public and the park's river concessionaires in a fair and
equitable manner for the last 21 years," said Odem. "The removal of fair market competition
between river concessions has resulted in a lack of affordable prices for concessions river trips
while Americans wait 20 years to access the Canyon if they want to float the river on their own.
Helicopters regularly land at the river's edge to remove concessions passengers from motorized
tour boats in the Park's potential wilderness. The Superintendent's removal of the public from
voicing concerns and participating in operational planning development of the Colorado River
prompted this legal action."
The Colorado River Management Plan has not been substantially revised and opened to public
comment since 1989. The 1989 CRMP was intended to be in operation for only five to ten years. The
1995 General Management Plan for Grand Canyon National Park also requires a revision of the
Colorado River Management Plan.
Grand Canyon Private Boaters Association (GCPBA) is a 600-member organization with members from
across the United States. Its goal is fair and equitable access for all members of the public to
our national lands and parks, and to provide a means for private citizens to participate in
management planning, protection, and support of these lands, especially at Grand Canyon National
Park.
National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA) is America's only private, nonprofit citizen
organization dedicated solely to protecting, preserving, and enhancing the U.S. National Park
System. NPCA was founded in 1919 and today has nearly 450,000 members. "NPCA-Protecting Parks for
Future Generations."
American Whitewater is the only national, nonprofit conservation organization dedicated solely to
protecting America's whitewater rivers. Founded in 1957, American Whitewater is a membership
organization with 8,600 members and 160 canoe and paddling club affiliates nationwide. Its
mission is to conserve and restore America's whitewater resources and to enhance opportunities to
enjoy them safely.
Three Arizona residents and one resident of Oregon are also plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
The full text of the complaint can be found at www.gcpba.org.
For more information contact:
Byron Hayes, Grand Canyon Private Boaters Association, 1-888-443-0540 (pager)
Jason Robertson, American Whitewater, 1-301-589-9453
Randall Rasmussen, National Parks Conservation Association, 1-505-247-1221