You’ve followed a link to a topic that doesn’t exist yet.
If permissions allow (as a AW Member, you may edit River Wiki, for example) you may create it by using the “Create This Page Button” below by hovering your mouse over the edit wrench.
If you don’t see a wrench, you don’t have permission to edit or edit is turned off.
If you don’t know what you are doing click on the sandbox and instructions link off the create page link.
LUSK CREEK NEAR EDDYVILLE, IL [ IL ] |
Current Conditions
Station Graphs |
| Level Legend: | Running | Below Minimum Recommended Flow | Above Maximum Recommended Flow | Unknown |
| State | River Name/Section | Class | Level | Rel. Level | Updated | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | Bear Branch— Bridge to Lusk Creek (4 miles) | III | 0 cfs | low | 10/11 7:30 | |
| IL | Lusk Creek— Lusk Creek Canyon (4.5 miles) | I-III | 0 cfs | low | 10/11 7:30 |
| AW Gauge ID: | 1690 |
| USGS Station: | 03384450 |
| HUC: | 05140203 |
| Latitude: | 37.4722 |
| Longitude: | -88.5472 |
| Class: | 5 |
User Comments |
|
2008-05-02 03:30:52 (162 days ago)
Does anyone here have any more information they might be able to post about Lusk Creek or Bear Branch of Lusk Creek? If anyone has ever ran the canyon either could you maybe give a description of it? Edit
|
|
2008-01-08 11:09:33 (277 days ago)
On Lusk Creek, the canyon itself has no rapids, but it is a very impressive site with the vertical walls and small, tall waterfalls. However, there are several class II to class III rapids leading up to the canyon if the flow is above 400 CFS. There is also a large standing wave immediately downstream from the mandatory portage at the bottom of the canyon. At flows above 1000-1500 CFS, Lusk becomes more difficult and it is not recommended.
Bear Branch is much steeper and more difficult than Lusk Creek. It has a much smaller drainage area and, therefor, lower flows than Lusk, which can be nice. However, if you follow Bear Branch (at a decent flow) all the way to Lusk, Lusk may be over 1000 CFS.
Edit
|
(KML)help