GCNP: Grand Canyon Suit Settled! Planning to Resume
|UPDATE (February 5, 2002): American Whitewater learned that the court accepted the settlement agreement today. This is significant due to the fact that the new planning process and other elements of the agreement now go into effect.|
NEWS RELEASEFor Immediate Release
January 17, 2002
Jason Robertson, American Whitewater, 301-589-9453
Randall Rasmussen, National Parks Conservation Association, 505-280-7788
David Jenkins, American Canoe Association, 703-451-0141 ext. 20
Willie Odem, Grand Canyon Private Boaters Association, 928-774-7005
Kim Crumbo, representative for the four individual plaintiffs, 928-638-2304
Lori Potter; Kelly, Haglund, Garnsey & Kahn, LLC; attorney for plaintiffs, 303-296-9412
Grand Canyon Colorado River Lawsuit Settled
River and Wilderness Planning to Resume
"The settlement is a victory for all people who care about the Grand Canyon," said Willie Odem, former president of the Grand Canyon Private Boaters Association. "It allows the public to regain their voice concerning the future of the Grand Canyon."
The settlement was filed today in federal court in Phoenix, Arizona, and resolves a lawsuit filed in July, 2000, by the conservation groups and four individuals. The plaintiffs had challenged former park Superintendent Rob Arnberger's February, 2000, decision to abandon work on a wilderness plan and a revised Colorado River management plan the park had begun in 1997. The settlement includes a list of issues the Park Service must address in the renewed planning process, such as the use of motorized boats and helicopters to transport river passengers in proposed wilderness and ways to improve access to the river for non-commercial boaters.
"This agreement is vital to preserving over 100 years of river-running tradition," said Jason Robertson, access director for American Whitewater. "Citizens deserve a fair shot at a self-guided wilderness-quality float trip through the Grand Canyon and a quarter-century wait for a private boater permit is unreasonably long."
"The impact of commercial motorized trips through the canyon is a serious concern that affects both the availability and quality of float trips for the public," said David Jenkins, director of conservation and public policy for American Canoe Association. "We expect the Park Service will undertake an open planning process that legitimately addresses this issue and takes public sentiment into account."
"A public process is the appropriate forum in which to resolve issues concerning motorized uses within the Colorado River corridor while preserving the canyon's unparalleled wilderness character," said Liz Boussard, an individual plaintiff in the lawsuit. "We are glad the Park Service agreed to address these issues in the upcoming plan. After two decades of impasse, it is time for the American people to have a voice in resolving the debate over the use of motorboats and helicopters in proposed wilderness."
The settlement commits the Park Service to restarting the Colorado River Management Plan within 120 days and completing the plan in 2004. Although conservation groups pressured the park to merge the river plan with the park's 1998 Draft Wilderness Management Plan, the Park Service retained the option to prepare these plans consecutively.
"The Colorado River forms the backbone of the park's 1.1 million acres of proposed wilderness" said Kim Crumbo, an individual plaintiff in the lawsuit and the park's former wilderness coordinator. "We feel strongly that the river and wilderness management plans should be combined into one cohesive document. To do otherwise does not make sense because river issues are tied directly with wilderness issues and vice versa."
"The settlement is significant because all the parties to the lawsuit-conservation and private boating groups, the Park Service, and commercial river outfitters-agree it is important to restart a public planning process now," said Randall Rasmussen, program manager for National Parks Conservation Association. "We have confidence in the current park superintendent to guide the public through what no one doubts will be a controversial process concerning the future of the very heart and soul of the Grand Canyon."
Three Arizona residents and one resident of Oregon also were plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
PlaintiffsAmerican Canoe Association is the nation's oldest and largest paddlesports organization. Founded in 1880, the ACA currently has 50,000 members nationwide. The ACA is dedicated to protecting and enhancing paddling opportunities through its programs in resource protection, access, safety, instruction and events. www.acanet.org
American Whitewater is the only national, nonprofit conservation organization dedicated solely to protecting America's whitewater rivers. Founded in 1957, American Whitewater is a membership organization with 8,300 members and 160 canoe and paddling club affiliates nationwide. Its mission is to conserve and restore America's whitewater resources and enhance opportunities to enjoy them safely. www.americanwhitewater.org
Grand Canyon Private Boaters Association is an all-volunteer non-profit organization representing over 800 members from across the United States. Its goal is fair and equitable access for all members of the public to our national lands and parks, and to provide a means for private citizens to participate in management planning, protection, and support of these lands, especially at Grand Canyon National Park. www.gcpba.org
National Parks Conservation Association is America's only private, nonprofit citizen organization dedicated solely to protecting, preserving, and enhancing the U.S. National Park System. NPCA was founded in 1919 and today has more than 425,000 members, including about 10,000 members in Arizona. www.eparks.org
American Whitewater has long worked on the Grand Canyon of the Colorado River. From fighting dam proposal decades ago, to advocating for equitable access in the recent development of a new management