The Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forests (GMUG) are revising their Forest Plan. The
new Forest Plan will dictate how recreation, wildlife habitats, watersheds, timber projects,
grazing, and more will be managed on the GMUG for the next 20-30 years. We need your involvement
to protect important whitewater resources and the special landscapes throughout the Forests.
Public Comments are due on the draft by December 8th.
â€¨â€¨The Forests have published the Draft Assessment – an important milestone in the
multi-year process to create a new Forest Plan for the GMUG. The Draft Assessment captures how
the Forests are being impacted by current management. It determines the focus of the plan
revision and lays the foundation for the entire process.â€¨â€¨Please review the assessment to
ensure it matches your perception of the current state of the Forests and send your comments
before the December 8th deadline. Read them here:
As you read the Draft Assessment, keep in mind that the Forests are looking for your input on
these questions: Is the GMUG on track with the information assembled? Did they capture what's
going well and what's not going well on the GMUG, or are they missing any critical pieces?
And most importantly, does the potential need for change reflect the major issues that the
Forests should concentrate on in plan revision?
After American Whitewater’s review here are the key things that jumped out at us:
Slow down a bit. The GMUG Assessment is moving fast and the quality may suffer. Brisk is good,
but the GMUG planning team only provided a 30 day comment period (which included Thanksgiving).
Timelines should not take precedence over thorough public engagement. Public input is an
essential and legally required part of this process.
The Assessment is missing essential maps. Recreation must be depicted spatially – using
maps and GIS data – not just through narratives, anecdotes, and descriptions as found in
the Recreation report. The same is needed for the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum. Many advanced
spatial resources are available from the recreation community such as MTB Project, Mountain
Project, TrailForks, American Whitewater’s National Whitewater Inventory, and Outdoor
Alliance’s recreation GIS repository. These should be used to fill in the gaps in the
forests’ map data.
The inventory of recreation assets is incomplete. The full scope and importance of dispersed
recreation is not fully captured in the Recreation report. Some of the most iconic recreation
destinations in the country are located within the GMUG. The description of outdoor recreation
resources in the report is not commensurate with the importance of these areas to users and local
communities. Speak up about the specific places that meant the most to you.
Outdoor recreation’s significant contribution to local communities is undervalued. Outdoor
Recreation contributes $28 billion dollars in direct spending and supports 220 thousand jobs in
Colorado. The trail systems in Mesa County alone generate $12.5 million in economic activity in
the county. In The Benefits to People report’s estimate of recreation activity generating a
combined $32.2 million in labor income across all the forests woefully under represents the
economic importance of recreation to the local communities.
Speaking of the American Whitewater’s National Whitewater Inventory, make sure to ask the
Forests to consult this when they are building their list of
“eligible” rivers for Wild and Scenic designation. Let them know that you’ll be engaged
in the process when they move to identify Wild and Scenic streams.
This is one our best opportunities to provide the rivers and creeks in the Forests, and the
landscapes that surround them, with the protections they deserve. Thank you for taking the time
on the future of the GMUG!